Substitution as a hazard-control method typically leads to which outcome?

Substitution as a hazard-control method typically leads to which outcome?

• A. Reduced risk
• B. Increased risk
• C. No change
• D. Higher cost

Answer: (A)

Substitution reduces risk by removing the hazard at its source and replacing it with a safer alternative. When you swap a dangerous material or process for something less hazardous, worker exposure and the potential for harm decrease because the conditions that could cause harm are altered or eliminated. This aligns with tackling danger ahead of time, rather than relying on protective gear or procedures after exposure has begun. For example, using a less toxic solvent or a safer cleaning method cuts down the chance and severity of adverse health effects. Substitution may require changes in equipment or processes and can affect cost or performance, but the overall risk to workers is typically lowered.

Substitution reduces risk by removing the hazard at its source and replacing it with a safer alternative. When you swap a dangerous material or process for something less hazardous, worker exposure and the potential for harm decrease because the conditions that could cause harm are altered or eliminated. This aligns with tackling danger ahead of time, rather than relying on protective gear or procedures after exposure has begun. For example, using a less toxic solvent or a safer cleaning method cuts down the chance and severity of adverse health effects. Substitution may require changes in equipment or processes and can affect cost or performance, but the overall risk to workers is typically lowered.